Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 07 May 1997 11:32:34 -0600
From:      Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
To:        Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Where to start SMP? 
Message-ID:  <199705071732.LAA04643@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 May 1997 14:37:01 BST." <Pine.BSF.3.91.970507143232.6423F-100000@bagpuss.visint.co.uk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

>Maybe, but surely some of the changes to run an efficient SMP system 
>should come at kernel compile level. Unless FreeBSD moves to a modular 
>system on the scale of something like HURD this looks likely to decrease 
>performance.

my rule is that when the choice is between "works faster/better" and
"more convient", "faster/better" wins.  I don't always win the "discussions"
where we make the final decision, but I'll always fight for that position.

--
Steve Passe	| powered by 
smp@csn.net	|            Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705071732.LAA04643>