From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 00:32:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16ED437B401; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 00:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onion.ish.org (onion.ish.org [219.118.161.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C71D43FBF; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 00:32:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ishizuka@ish.org) Received: from localhost (ishizuka@localhost [IPv6:::1]) h597WqaO039839; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:32:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ishizuka@ish.org) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:32:52 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20030609.163252.71109503.ishizuka@ish.org> To: das@freebsd.org From: Masachika ISHIZUKA In-Reply-To: <20030609041942.GA4029@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <200305280102.LAA00949@lightning.itga.com.au> <20030609.114033.74731601.ishizuka@ish.org> <20030609041942.GA4029@HAL9000.homeunix.com> X-PGP-Fingerprint20: 276D 697A C2CB 1580 C683 8F18 DA98 1A4A 50D2 C4CB X-PGP-Fingerprint16: C6 DE 46 24 D7 9F 22 EB 79 E2 90 AB 1B 9A 35 2E X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.ish.org/pgp-public-key.txt X-URL: http://www.ish.org/ X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system slowdown - vnode related X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 07:32:54 -0000 >> I have still vnodes problem in 4.8-stable with /sys/kern/vfs_subr.c >> 1.249.2.30. >> >> (1) #1 machine (Celeron 466 with 256 mega byte rams) >> >> % sysctl kern.maxvnodes >> kern.maxvnodes: 17979 >> % sysctl vm.zone | grep VNODE >> VNODE: 192, 0, 18004, 122, 18004 > > This looks pretty normal to me for a quiescent system. Hi, David-san. Thank you for mail. I think the used(18004) exceeds maxvnodes(17979), isn't it ? > I would actually suggest raising maxvnodes if you have lots of > little files. Does the number of vnodes shoot up when 310.locate > runs? The value shown above is the value at slow down time of 310.locate. The number of used vnodes is low at boot up until 310.locate invoked. > Did you get a backtrace from the panics? It's too hard for me. Is there any way to do it ? -- ishizuka@ish.org