From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 24 03:10:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBE216A406 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9090713C4C8 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0O3AMYc028785 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:10:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l0O3AMZC028777; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:10:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:10:22 GMT Message-Id: <200701240310.l0O3AMZC028777@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/108216: ipv6 broken in 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Bruce A. Mah" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:10:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/108216; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd@spatula.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/108216: ipv6 broken in 6.2 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:09:01 -0800 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig809B8675A140377938AA1165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is part of a private email I tried to send but it got bounced. # Just to follow-up with this: I finally did an item for the errata # document, with a workaround. # # This is really an odd bug. The results I am getting via testing are # different from what Dimitry Andric is getting (see our thread on net@ # and stable@). So while I agree that something needs to be fixed, it's # not at all clear given the results we have so far what the fix is. # # As for the odd code you found...I agree this looks kind of suspicious. # I haven't examined the code around it though because I'm still trying t= o # understand why my fix seems to work for me. --------------enig809B8675A140377938AA1165 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFts3N2MoxcVugUsMRAvKtAKCWUkIfTjQdSeaEGur+rx04H/2FZACdEs6v vhSTTIc1h3epfgzogce3gU4= =wFN7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig809B8675A140377938AA1165--