Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:10:25 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Should/does loader.efi respect the "bootme" GPT attribute ? Message-ID: <CANCZdfqhi742n9V%2BwCzhniB3QU5Equo%2BsnEOz0xQ2GmPKo27PQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <25469.1608040822@critter.freebsd.dk> <CANCZdfpcrXcgnh1O74A-MhSO2NFqTtq0rJrBDpEfwgxbVDPN8A@mail.gmail.com> <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:51 AM Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > Warner Losh writes: > > > It is intentional. UEFI really doesn't want you using non-standard > > partition flags to determine boot order. > > So how would one go about doing "boot0/nanobsd-style" dual > root the "proper" way in an UEFI environment ? > By using gptboot.efi in the ESP and placaing loader.efi in the UFS partitions... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqhi742n9V%2BwCzhniB3QU5Equo%2BsnEOz0xQ2GmPKo27PQ>