Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:10:25 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Should/does loader.efi respect the "bootme" GPT attribute ?
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfqhi742n9V%2BwCzhniB3QU5Equo%2BsnEOz0xQ2GmPKo27PQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <25469.1608040822@critter.freebsd.dk> <CANCZdfpcrXcgnh1O74A-MhSO2NFqTtq0rJrBDpEfwgxbVDPN8A@mail.gmail.com> <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:51 AM Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
> Warner Losh writes:
>
> > It is intentional. UEFI really doesn't want you using non-standard
> > partition flags to determine boot order.
>
> So how would one go about doing "boot0/nanobsd-style" dual
> root the "proper" way in an UEFI environment ?
>

By using gptboot.efi in the ESP and placaing loader.efi in the UFS
partitions...

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqhi742n9V%2BwCzhniB3QU5Equo%2BsnEOz0xQ2GmPKo27PQ>