From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Dec 15 20:10:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693274C0D5F for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CwTsB0tcXz4pG9 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1E5154C0E77; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E16F4C0E76 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CwTsB0DDmz4pM4 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id 186so20437571qkj.3 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:10:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SIbKdE9psCSI8ezjEr3CwYwqSOmZRikekqaeOblGKb4=; b=TfGbfvlVD/Mqj7T5mE1pyVSD4DaqlMnKAGC9GXPRJ60pqDcyz9FP4LIDiFrJW80mK8 St8lBmlJJG18Nca6G8DHwv6hFJHFYnunw1CEIIupoeJeOW9Kjhp5zNnzqh5QH8cMdtgu npS2Z0AU4wwfuJ/YerPi8NM3CtAJH2YKf6uKUCSlXEe6kW5EQaaKGI1+stAWLfN2Tq07 H4x046yuOgmMORQq0KuNoVvm4zHNS0AptPY2hXxBVfjY2tbrBPOfaMalhDwgpIBdjLgl 9zn8ZilCtoBStksYbmaR7ptHNrN5bql4aa7hEF35ZH131fKknlQ9OKLHpQxIBfiTI6Db xTkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SIbKdE9psCSI8ezjEr3CwYwqSOmZRikekqaeOblGKb4=; b=jeNnlbp5KnsrpDxtuqrYxR5PK9Q2eh0gKMnHHV1nGhRBKbFvvoYjdaifcZZxZAwuoj rX59osdTmRvXMx+ShweoOoBhBy0hC9diwBuYJYb4om/je4y1X4ZPKbtXzpkizVpqqhzd LYlRo3PGBoRFJJ5xEjFjpBWMZbtlb8WTNdtbIUKuUA7BQfQvZ/58xpOmCYx/IFsBleiE CSunEmnaml+fdXVP2Qw4OW8T0bZNmPK3Yvg0P5OkBY52fzpUByCjpeEockOrlZl/vD8l +8BQ2F30352rNbDQwj2mugAos0V4CV6Z/Fb7/K0PBfqfVhNGIcQJ+yHJnKMVNHfNYsI/ i48w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qWy+uVKz6JJa2EJrqvZQaZPSd/nveXaFOPQudRL+crfycUjnS O61ADCVWPV12gcEHvoWmjdUjb5+uhwhvnEWihpvILShJ2Bzg0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/Ga6PxdZJiP8+PVuQ9z+ce5Vd/2Wp0DfqE+FyYP3hZZplBI7C7MEtHnuzQ/YI0F3hE0SlxA9Sv3SZUGHc4vw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:306:: with SMTP id 6mr20005265qkd.206.1608063036376; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:10:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <25469.1608040822@critter.freebsd.dk> <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:10:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Should/does loader.efi respect the "bootme" GPT attribute ? To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CwTsB0DDmz4pM4 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:10:38 -0000 On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:51 AM Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Warner Losh writes: > > > It is intentional. UEFI really doesn't want you using non-standard > > partition flags to determine boot order. > > So how would one go about doing "boot0/nanobsd-style" dual > root the "proper" way in an UEFI environment ? > By using gptboot.efi in the ESP and placaing loader.efi in the UFS partitions... Warner