From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 29 23:24:44 2009
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05450106566B;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::29])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C0A8FC0C;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6TNOhwo045218;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:43 GMT
	(envelope-from dougb@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from dougb@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6TNOhOd045217;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:43 GMT (envelope-from dougb)
Message-Id: <200907292324.n6TNOhOd045217@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:43 +0000 (UTC)
To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Cc: 
Subject: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:24:44 -0000

dougb       2009-07-29 23:24:43 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository

  Modified files:
    ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in 
  Log:
  Feature Updates
  ===============
  1. For the -[rf] and -R options:
  a. Do not delete the flag files that indicate a port has been updated
  until the -[rf] process is successful.
  b. Update the wording in usage() to be more clear about what -R does
  c. If a user starts -[rf] without -R, and there are flag files present,
  ask if they would like to delete them, or enable -R mode.
  
  2. Add a globstrip() function and use it to clean up inputs to -x
  (and in the input parser where the idea originated)
  
  3. Improve the wording of the message in -s mode about what to do if
  they choose not to remove a port with an empty +REQUIRED_BY file
  
  4. Tell the user how many fetches we are waiting for in -F
  
  Removed Feature
  ===============
  Remove the -u option. It did very little, and not what users expected.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  2.8       +58 -43    ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files/portmaster.sh.in