From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 20:50:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FA316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:50:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8758F43D45 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:50:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBSKoRfP003893 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:50:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBSKoRog003892; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:50:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:50:27 GMT Message-Id: <200412282050.iBSKoRog003892@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Matthias Buelow Subject: Re: ports/68826: various anomalies with xemacs port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Buelow List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:50:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/68826; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthias Buelow To: Pawel Worach Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/68826: various anomalies with xemacs port Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:47:18 +0100 Pawel Worach wrote: > First step at addressing the buffer tabs and Xaw3d, also fix a typo. > 'make -DMOTIF_STATIC -DWITH_XAW3D' should produce the same result as > defined above now. Tested both motif and athena (no 3d) builds, they > look good. > > (Can we start here and then I'll continue and clean up the makefile > variabes and maybe leave just a few like, WITHOUT_X11, WITH_MOTIF, > WITH_ATHENA, WITH_GTK, WITH_XAW3D ?) It looks ok from judging with naked-eye check (won't apply here since apparently the patch got somehow mangled thru mail.. whatever). Another thing: could the dependency on the xemacs-packages port be removed? Xemacs really has its own packages system, and the xemacs-packages port is a rather arbitrary (and, as I found out, sometimes outdated) assortment. What would be cool would be: a) plain xemacs port, which doesn't install any packages, and b) xemacs "sumo" packages port, which installs the sumo (i.e. all) package tarball. Anything in between doesn't really make sense, since what packages to include, and what not depends on the personal preferences of the port maintainer. mkb.