From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 15:02:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F69106568D for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2888FC14 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1330544fxm.3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:02:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rZvM9lO36u4cSHDdzcED+zyP9e9OSTU/hNJG9cgihK4=; b=T06AKAJqfnd1LvUs3+LNjwpmqOC04ZZYec+RzqqNQhMKM87MQ/7792Aw0v7uFHceUw D1EJPm48TSotoGOuRrvd+ZE/HlkoXsOSEIXsHg6yeK0Ev/Z8b8VFAmDqzHIw3iJMn2D9 QgguVHknwH9yX7wJxcorDW3mJ3LF2EqAHQ+L4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dlZ4IEfDeJ/fErASassSIXqRpwuthC0eCBPAJp6BZwzpycgWYoh8HXncztQ0O6QpIa upKZMPBu7DjdA9yGr6SnHABA0I5yZAB0v2XRXsZShu8Kq4DxSQhAZBBCeYV+SbdIMFSZ 2tB0ZhtyiPwjqj+liQIMkaCsCcCfVrzlobiTA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.126.40 with SMTP id d40mr3454317mun.132.1258556552239; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:02:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2e027be00911180637h4da6d4f0ma00ff11d860f901a@mail.gmail.com> References: <200911172027.15749.gnemmi@gmail.com> <19e9a5dc0911180634h2484d4d7seedc1611c7e218f2@mail.gmail.com> <2e027be00911180637h4da6d4f0ma00ff11d860f901a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:02:32 -0300 Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0911180702u5db22affld1dbea591163b240@mail.gmail.com> From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:02:33 -0000 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Eitan Adler > >wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Gonzalo Nemmi >> wrote: >> > > WITHOUT_FLOOPY=yes >> > >> > Just a note - are you sure this is correct? >> > >> >> Dear Eitan: >> >> Up to a second ago I was .. now you are making me have second toughts .. >> I'm using that line on my notebook, wich doesn't have a floopy drive ... >> Would you advice me not to use that line, and could you tell me why? >> (really >> honest question ... I mean maybe WITHOUT_FLOOPY=yes interferes with >> something else that I'm not aware of) >> >> Thanks for your answer >> Best Regards >> > > I think he was thinking that your laptop doesn't have a FLOPPY drive, so > maybe you should have WITHOUT_FLOPPY=yes . > > Now I want a floopy drive :/ > > Cheers > > Tom > Now I got lost .. I mean, I don't have a floopy drive in my laptop and that's why I added WITHOUT_FLOPPY=yes to my src.conf BTW: last floopy drives I tried would just chew disks in a few reads .. very bad quality floopy drives .. Regards Gonzalo Nemmi