From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 27 11:18:54 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CCB1065674;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:18:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de)
Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184F58FC15;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q6RBIbVU047027;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:18:52 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de)
Received: (from olli@localhost)
	by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q6RBIboO047026;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:18:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:18:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <201207271118.q6RBIboO047026@lurza.secnetix.de>
From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
To: dougb@freebsd.org (Doug Barton), FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>,
	Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>,
	Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, Jase Thew <jase@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201207270925.q6R9PLCR042556@lurza.secnetix.de>
X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-ports
User-Agent: tin/1.9.6-20101126 ("Burnside") (UNIX)
	(FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386))
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9
	(lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:18:53 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:18:54 -0000

Oliver Fromme wrote:
 > Doug Barton wrote:
 > > Traditionally the precedence has been:
 > > 
 > > make.conf < OPTIONS < command line
 > 
 > Are you sure?  But how did the old framework find out if a
 > WITH_* / WITHOUT_* variable came from make.conf or from the
 > command line?

Uhm, please ignore what I wrote.  I forgot about "?=" syntax
in make.conf ...  In that case it works fine, of course.

So, it really should be sufficient to move the compatibility
section (the one that looks at WITH_* / WITHOUT_*) to the
end of bsd.options.mk, after the section that loads the
options file from $PORTS_DBDIR.  Then the desired behaviour
should be back.

Best regards
   Oliver


-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"Python is an experiment in how much freedom programmers need.
Too much freedom and nobody can read another's code; too little
and expressiveness is endangered."
        -- Guido van Rossum