From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 22:53:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB831065674 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF68FC18 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m53MrAPd014883; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:53:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m53Mr7Lf014880; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:53:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:53:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20080603100421.B5921@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Message-ID: References: <20080602232417.J36835@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080603100421.B5921@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:53:10 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: Duplex printer advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:53:11 -0000 On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> This depends a lot on your print jobs. Low quality machine-generated >> PostScript output can be slow. PCL can also be slow. The only way to >> really know is to benchmark with your print jobs. > > there was no case i found postscript to print faster. But then you've said you're using a LaserJet 4, which came out in 1992 and has a slow PS interpreter. Some of my print jobs ran much faster in PS, because it only sent a few K of PS rather than a megabyte of bitmap in PCL. >> There's also the potential overhead of the print processing systems. Just >> sending PS in the first place may be quicker than apsfilter or CUPS. > > i use lpd+my script for filtering postscript to PCL > >> Recent printers have fast RISC CPUs and fast PS interpreters. I/O speed >> comes into it, too. FreeBSD seems particularly slow over parallel and USB > > both not true, but just use lptcontrol for parallel port! Did that, didn't help (at the time). Not an issue with Ethernet. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA