From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 17 04:10:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA11443 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 04:10:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA11347 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 04:10:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@panda.hilink.com.au) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA02963; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:58:45 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:58:45 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Harry Patterson cc: "stable freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FTP and Telnet pblms with Ethernet In-Reply-To: <01bd3b98$2bd837a0$d86190cf@harry> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Harry Patterson wrote: > connection to a FreeBSD 2.2.5 box. Apache works fine (fast) so it doesn't > seem to be a DNS thing (simple DNS with only one box, one domain, nslookup Apache could be set to not do reverse lookups. Is ping/nslookup fast from the FreeBSD when resolving reverse domains, e.g. the IP address of your win95 box? > I've seen this question posted in a couple of places (I've been virtually > everywhere) and the only response was possibly DNS. If it was DNS, why > would http work fine? Because apache is not doing reverse lookups, and other things are. Danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message