From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 16:42:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E7F37B404 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from win149.staff.flyingcroc.net (win149.staff.flyingcroc.net [207.246.150.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4422743F93 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:42:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rdb@blarg.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) h3ANgFN14760 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:42:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:42:15 -0700 (PDT) From: RDB X-X-Sender: russell@win149.staff.flyingcroc.net To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Semi-polling mode and net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:42:16 -0000 Hi, I'm curious whether anyone on this list has found real-world circumstances in which either semi-polling mode or the net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable setting improved performance, and if so what the circumstances were. Conversely, has anyone experienced unforseen problems (e.g. stability issues) with either of these new features? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=tcp&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+4.7-RELEASE http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=polling&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+4.6-RELEASE Sincerely, Russell Brunelle P.S. The release notes for 4.8-R indicate that support for HyperThreading (via the new HTT kernel option) is "rudimentary." I'm curious: in what sense is it rudimentary? Are there stability issues? What are some of the plans to improve this feature, if it's a feature issue rather than a stability issue?