Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:45:14 -0500 (EST) From: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com> To: <cjclark@alum.mit.edu> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: -STABLE buildkernel broke! (linux module) Message-ID: <20011110084302.Q15665-100000@voyager.straynet.com> In-Reply-To: <20011110001614.B51003@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Crist J. Clark babbled .. ;; On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 04:43:51PM +0900, HIRATA Yasuyuki wrote: ;; > ;; > > I get as far as compiling the kernel, and all is fine until it starts to ;; > > build my modules for me (linux.ko, in fact). Attached you'll find the ;; > > output of what is spit at me. ;; > ;; > I also had the same trouble. In my case, it was avoidable by deleting ;; > /usr/src/sys/compile/MOMO directory and redoing from "config MOMO". I ;; > do not understand the reason. :-) ;; ;; Stale dependencies. Doing a 'rm -rf /usr/obj/sys/KERNEL' or 'rm -rf ;; /usr/src/sys/compile/KERNEL' as the case may be, when you have updated ;; souce code is always a good idea. Makes sense. Explains why it didn't work until I config -r'd. Either way then, why doesn't buildkernel do this? I typically use the buildkernel target from /usr/src to build my kernel, for simplicities sake, and that appears broken. Shouldn't it do a clean? (Like doing a buildworld cleans /usr/obj) /gnp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011110084302.Q15665-100000>