From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 10:08:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7A216A41F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:08:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B805643D48 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 30595 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2005 10:08:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (85.95.80.111) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 2 Sep 2005 10:08:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 65413 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Sep 2005 13:08:34 +0300 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:08:34 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050902100834.GB25237@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Mail-Followup-To: Poul-Henning Kamp , Tom Rhodes , arch@FreeBSD.org References: <20050902053927.3656b245@localhost> <34962.1125655258@phk.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34962.1125655258@phk.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Tom Rhodes , arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Consoles, past and future. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:08:37 -0000 --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:00:58PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050902053927.3656b245@localhost>, Tom Rhodes writes: >=20 >=20 > >My question is, and I know this hasn't been tested so be my > >guest and theorize a bit. Are there any performance gains > >or losses as a result of taking this route? >=20 > If we are concerned about the performance of /dev/console, we > need our collective heads and tails smacked until we come to > our senses :-) Somebody fortune this! :) (Hey, 'fortune' is a verb, innit now?) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish. --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDGCSi7Ri2jRYZRVMRAmDaAJ93dTeY9bdbVnLJk15Ja8HG35mcHwCeLUIy VDc6X/UEjTAdiEGVN3P7uQA= =yK3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw--