From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 9 13:40:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A2D1514D for ; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5C0DB1C24; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E573815; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:44:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Gary Jennejohn Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/xemacs Makefile ports/japanese/xemacs/pkg DESCR ports/japanese/xemacs-canna Makefile ports/japanese/xemacs-canna/pkg DESCR ports/japanese/xemacs-canna+wnn4 Makefile ports/japanese/xemacs-canna+wnn4/pkg DESCR ... In-Reply-To: <199909092036.WAA74243@peedub.muc.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > This is getting out of hand. We have so many various xemacs ports now that > I'm losing track. There seems to be a lot of redundancy. The xemacs21 > maintainer asked to update to 21.1.6 but I'm starting to wonder whether > it's worth doing since most of the changes I'd make are already in one > or more of these other ports. Every time a Big Emacs Commit comes through, I say the same thing. Every time I'm met with "They really are different!". They all belong in one non-virtual category, if you ask me. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message