From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 14:10:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCB51065678; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E5E8FC1D; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.170.20.44] (nat-170-142-177-44.tn.gov [170.142.177.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4REAhNk016187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 May 2010 10:10:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4BFE7D45.8020505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:10:13 -0500 From: Robert Noland Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090218) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Shuvaev References: <20100511132709.GA47986@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <4BE9639C.8060102@FreeBSD.org> <20100511182119.GA46020@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <20100526223502.GA5319@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> In-Reply-To: <20100526223502.GA5319@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Tom Russo , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg 7.5 and Openmotif applications. X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:10:55 -0000 Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: >>> >>> Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >>>> Hello list! >>>> >>>> There seems to be a known/fixed bug in new xserver that leads to >>>> (many|all?) motif-based applications to malfunction: >>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25400 >>>> >>>> There are already at least 2 PRs opened against individual ports: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146383 >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146380 >>>> >>>> I think it is wrong to patch applications when the fault seems to be >>>> in the server. Now I am running patched xserver with the patch pulled >>> >from the upstream git master: >>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=1c612acca8568fcdf9761d23f112adaf4d496f1b >>>> >>>> I confirm that math/grace now works OK (PR 141383). >>>> I'll watch if the patch causes any side effects (nothing so far). >>>> What about dropping attached patch to x11-servers/xorg-server/files? >>>> >>>> Cross-posting to ports@ as the bug already leaked in the individual >>>> ports' PRs. >>> Let's look at updating to 1.7.7 or 1.8.0. I need to poke the commit >>> logs for 1.7.7 and see if it is included. >>> >> Even better so. Just downloaded xorg-server-1.7.7.tar.gz and the patch >> is already there: >> >> [snip] >> >> |--- dix/events.c.orig >> |+++ dix/events.c >> -------------------------- >> Patching file dix/events.c using Plan A... >> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n >> > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far. > Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7? > Should I file PR? I have an update to 1.7.7 queued up in my tree along with an updated pixman. It is a little tedious as all of the server based ports need to be updated and drivers need PORTREVISION bumps. I'll try and get it committed in the next couple of days though. robert. > Alexey. >