From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 22 16:48:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8617416A400 for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD3013C4BE for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from services.tcbug.org (services.tcbug.org [208.42.148.82]) by cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B118367; Tue, 22 May 2007 11:48:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by services.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1CDCD9B41E; Tue, 22 May 2007 11:50:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:50:42 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel To: Ivan Carey Message-ID: <20070522165042.GD8220@tcbug.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ivan Carey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4652D3A9.3050509@careytech.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4652D3A9.3050509@careytech.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Options fo a File Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Josh Paetzel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:48:19 -0000 Ivan Carey wrote: > Hello, > What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server? > I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU > installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual 500Gb SATA > HDD's > > I am thinking of options that would make the kernel efficient as a pure file > server. > > Thanks, > Ivan Even with a GENERIC kernel you're going to be disk-bound, unless you have them in RAID 0, in which case you'll be network bound. If you are running i386 you can take out 486 and 586 support, that's probably the biggest single improvement you can make, and it's incremental at best. --- Thanks, Josh Paetzel