From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 9 21:10:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE3B106566B for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063F08FC16 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q89LAAQD011484 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q89LAAvl011472; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:10:10 GMT Message-Id: <201209092110.q89LAAvl011472@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: Stefano Marinelli X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:23:05 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/171355: FreeBSD 9.1rc1 (and 10-HEAD) not booting on HP Pavilion g6 2147sl X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stefano Marinelli List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 21:10:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/171355; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stefano Marinelli To: Alexander Motin Cc: attilio@freebsd.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/171355: FreeBSD 9.1rc1 (and 10-HEAD) not booting on HP Pavilion g6 2147sl Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 23:09:47 +0200 > That patch should just block HPET to allow booting without tunables. = Thanks for testing the patch, but that is not so interesting from = practical side. What I would try to do after that is switch HPET into = legacy_route mode that was known to work on previous AMDs: > hint.hpet.0.legacy_route=3D1 > hint.attimer.0.clock=3D0 > hint.atrtc.0.clock=3D0 After patching the kernel, I can now boot without tunables. Should I try = to set those values on the patched or unpatched kernel? Thanks, Stefano=