Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:22:25 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 194020] archivers/engrampa port broken by py-gobject
Message-ID:  <bug-194020-6497-jlqxKXtDcp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-194020-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-194020-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194020

--- Comment #11 from Dave <dcbdbis@comcast.net> ---
The definition of "bringing a system out of the ground"...well at least how I
do it!

a)  Customer sends me a brand new PC in box.

b)  I go into the BIOS and update it with the installed Windows OS. (if
applicable)

c)  I modify the BIOS to use legacy mode and turn off the EFI.

d)  I boot from the FreeBSD 10.0 Release AMD64 DVD and go into a shell first
thing. From the cli I issue "gpart destroy -F /dev/ada0". Then I exit the
shell.

e)  I install FreeBSD normally from the DVD and reboot. I do not install any
users at this stage.

f)  From the cli I issue "freebsd-update fetch install" Followed by a reboot

g)  On the next boot I rebuild the world following Warren Blocks excellent
article: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/buildworld.html

h)  Once the rebuilding world process is completed, then I "portsnap fetch
extract"

i)  Then from the cli I "cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster". Followed by
"make clean install clean (I know...an extra clean in there..but humor me
please)

j)  I then navigate back into root's home dir and: "portmaster x11/xorg"

k)  Followed by "portmaster x11/mate"

This is where the bug rears it's head.

I want to make sure you understand...in my forensics...I am finding differing
naming conventions for "py-gobject" vs "py27-gobject" These port name issues
span the website, the "pkg search" and the "whereis" utilities. I think the
issue is not so much with your build....as it is with inconsistent package
naming conventions for py-gobject.

The mate port is calling for "py27-gobject"...which doesn't exist in fresh
ports that are recently installed from scratch. Instead the package is
installed in the ports tree as "py-gobject"

If I manually "portmaster devel/py-gobject"...Then after building this one
port...I can continue mate's build with "portmaster -R x11/mate"...and all
builds, installs, and runs perfectly.

Hope this helps!

Thanks again.

Sincerely and respectfully,

Dave

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194020-6497-jlqxKXtDcp>