Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:      mi@aldan.algebra.com
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, jedgar@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist   ports/net/samba-devel/files patch-aa patch-af
Message-ID:  <200104181733.f3IHX1C36771@misha.privatelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ADDC746.F2C2E1CE@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Apr, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
= mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
= 
= > On 18 Apr, Will Andrews wrote:
= > = On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:58:22AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= > = > Great! Now,  again, would it be  possible to roll this  into the
= > = > 4.3 release?  I can imagine people  picking an OS based  just on
= > = > this...
= > =
= > = Nope. Ain't  gonna happen. The 2.2.0  release came in a  few hours
= > = too late. There's nothing that'll help the situation now.
= >
= > Well, something was done for emacs ports... You let them in once :)
=
= Nope, emacs ports were *fixed*, while  you are here proposing to *add*
= a new port

No. I'm proposing to *upgrade* an existing port.

= while the freeze  is over and bento is working  hard crunching package
= set.  Please read  Satoshi's  message  in the  cvs-all  list where  he
= explains why it couldn't be done.

It could be done.  It would just be very difficult and  require a lot of
work and, possibly, another ship-date  slippage. But it *might* be worth
it to help  attract some users, who will have  two packages (FreeBSD and
some Linux distro) in a store trying to chose...

I  don't use  Samba myself  and don't  know how  important their  latest
release is exactly. From the  Samba's press-release, it seemed important
and I'd  hate to learn  that somewhere decisions  were made to  use some
Linux distro  over FreeBSD, because "it  came with the latest  Samba". I
started  this thread  to get  a quick  discussion and,  may be,  attract
Will's and Satoshi's attention to the new release. Don't jump at me...

= > = Only thing we can do is ship 4.3R without the buggy Samba packages
= > = and then refer people to "pkg_add -r" or ports for Samba 2.2.0.
= >
= > I can  imagine some silly  reviews with "unfortunately,  the FreeBSD
= > 4.3 did not come with the latest Samba release, so ..." :(
= >
= >         -mi



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104181733.f3IHX1C36771>