Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:41:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: tex@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 226983] print/texlive-full: Missing dependency with SOURCE=ON: print/texlive-texmf-source : [Attachment 231152] Mk/bsd.tex.mk: make TEX=source depend on an existing file Message-ID: <bug-226983-41148-7p8N1jWaGD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226983-41148@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226983-41148@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> has asked Tex Mailing List (Nobody) <tex@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-approval: Bug 226983: print/texlive-full: Missing dependency with SOURCE=3DON: print/texlive-texmf-source https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226983 Attachment 231152: Mk/bsd.tex.mk: make TEX=3Dsource depend on an existing f= ile https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D231152&action=3Dedit --- Comment #8 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 231152 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D231152&action= =3Dedit Mk/bsd.tex.mk: make TEX=3Dsource depend on an existing file > One thing I wonder is: wouldn't it be better to leave the version out of bsd.tex.mk > altogether? I just added it because there are other version checks as wel= l, but > somehow, that looks like a fragile thing to do (will be forgotten on upda= tes anyways)? It seems, Poudriere behaves right without a version also. > Wait, now I get you say it's the *other* way around. With my patch, the dependency > will be on version 20150523 (or later), and that *is* the actual version = of the > texlive-texmf-source package. So,I don't see why this would not work? Tha= t's strange! Since I'm not sure if it makes sense at all to put a package instead of a f= ile into the _DEPS line (all other _DEPS always contain concrete files), I tried another approach: I picked out a file from the filelist of print/texlive-texmf-source which is most likely to be permanently included in the package and used it in Mk/bsd.tex.mk instead of .keep_me. And lo and behold, that seems to work without any problems. Probably this approach is more in the spirit of the framework. But it would= be good if someone else from the tex team could say something about it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226983-41148-7p8N1jWaGD>