From owner-freebsd-standards Thu Jan 31 15:23:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com (tan7.ncr.com [192.127.94.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8850D37B43A for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:23:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost) by opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0VNRHu96373; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:27:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chuckr@opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:27:16 -0800 (PST) From: chuck rouillard To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Subject: RE: pathchk In-Reply-To: <200201302216.g0UMG1Y64367@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: <20020131135842.A96280-100000@opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > Are you proposing replacing "sizeof(char)" with "1"? > > Surely the former is more clear? > > It makes it more clear that the author does not understand the C > language, perhaps. Grandiloquent nonsense. > > On another point: what is the general consensus on casting > > functions to void? > > I am of the opinion that it is silly. Other reasonable people > disagree. (I happen to think that their reasons for disagreement are > the result of inadequate tools, and the appropriate response is to fix > the tool, not kluge up the source code.) Agreed, but given the number such casts currently peppered about in the source tree, and maybe some of the recent arguments for __P() on -arch, should this practice be continued? I wouldn't mind hearing additional comments on this topic since I have other things I'd like contribute. .cr > -GAWollman > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message