Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:50:38 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing Message-ID: <op.wcpyqodb34t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <BCF3FB8D-7FF0-4CB4-8491-6472EDED96B2@shire.net> References: <BCF3FB8D-7FF0-4CB4-8491-6472EDED96B2@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Do I understand this right?
Working in FreeBSD 6.x:
interface em0: 1.2.3.4/24 <-- public IP, host only
192.168.1.1/24 <-- private IP, host only
192.168.1.2/24 <-- Jail #1
192.168.1.3/24 <-- Jail #2
With this configuration you had no problems accessing the internet from
the jails.
Is this correct? This seems bizarre; this should only be possible if
you're doing NAT somewhere in there and that is not possible with Jails v1
(which share a network stack) and is only possible in Jails v2 (vnet).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wcpyqodb34t2sn>