From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Jun 29 04:08:58 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA21172
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 04:08:58 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA21165
          ; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 04:08:54 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA01862; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 04:08:52 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 04:08:52 -0700
Message-Id: <199506291108.EAA01862@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: me@freebsd.org
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <m0sQuib-000PZoC@tartufo.pcs.dec.com> (me@tartufo.pcs.dec.com)
Subject: Re: utils/ explosion
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * In pcs.freebsd.ports you write:
 * 
 * >  cpm, hfs, mtools, pcemu, vmsbackup, wine
 * 
 * >in "emulators" (proposed by Jordan), and
 * 
 * I don't like this section. cpm, hfs, mtools and vmsbackup aren't
 * really emulators in the commonly used sense. What about having a
 * seperate dir for tools that transfer data to/from foreign formats?

I don't really like it either, if you dig into the ports archive from
around April you'll find that it took a lot of prodding from me about
the name until Jordan came up with something semi-usable. ;)

If you (or anyone else) have a better name, I'm all ears.

Satoshi