From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:55:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F2616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:55:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA7543D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:55:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j079t3eF013704; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:55:03 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j079t1WU001002; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:55:01 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j079t1X1001001; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:55:01 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:55:01 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Rob Message-ID: <20050107095501.GA899@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <41DDC4F2.5090709@yahoo.com> <20050107003806.GA14003@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <41DE5242.4030606@redesjm.local> <41DE5840.4060906@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DE5840.4060906@yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: Xorg ICE vs. Xfce4 (4.2-RC3) needs fixing /etc/rc.d/cleartmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:55:06 -0000 On 2005-01-07 18:37, Rob wrote: > What ever solution you guys decide, it has to be committed quickly. > With Xfce's new release 4.2 coming soon, and apparently KDE is also > having (or is going to have) problems here, a patch can't wait for > too long. > > Upgraded versions of these Window managers won't start on > 5.3-Stable; an unexperienced user may have great difficulties in > finding out what's going on. > > Maybe a temporary working patch would do. However, is it possible > to require a system upgrade with a port upgrade? Yes, it is not that Evil(TM). IIRC, people who want a "frozen in time" release are supposed to use the packages from their release CD-ROMs, are they not?