From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 22:46:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F47916A41F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:46:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jarek@adeon.lublin.pl) Received: from v00061.home.net.pl (list.pl [212.85.96.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 766D343D5A for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:46:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jarek@adeon.lublin.pl) Received: from bhs170.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (jarek.list@home@83.28.108.170) by matrix01.home.net.pl with SMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:46:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:46:27 +0200 From: JG X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1595762165.20050826004627@adeon.lublin.pl> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050825092957.GA49525@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1168719770.20050824183357@adeon.lublin.pl> <20050825092957.GA49525@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: JG List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:46:35 -0000 > Unpacking it on FreeBSD5 gives me such results: > > # time tar -xf mysql-m.tgz > 2.130u 20.187s 7:02.69 5.2% 41+382k 13097+8205io 0pf+0w > ...so 7 minutes of real time. I've checked the same file on *different* server, but it has very similar hardware (not Dell, but also Dual Xeon 2.8, SCSI, 2GB ram, etc...). It was on FreeBSD 4.10. # time tar -xf mysql-m.tgz 0.244u 33.724s 4:25.26 12.8% 374+291k 14216+1828io 8pf+0w During this test server was loaded (load averange about 1.00, Apache, MySQL running). I wasn't able to turn deamons off but I suspect this result could be much better than it was. So is my problem only FreeBSD5 releated? Seems to be. JG