From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 19:25:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F6016A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EDE43D41 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:25:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2O3Pu9D033018 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:25:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from kargl@localhost)i2O3Pu71033017 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:25:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kargl) From: "Steven G. Kargl" Message-Id: <200403240325.i2O3Pu71033017@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:25:56 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: memory allocation question X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:25:56 -0000 I may have finally talked my boss into updating my computational workstation (which runs FreeBSD). The directions of our computations is leading towards massive memory requirement. So, the question is: If I have an AMD64 system with 16GB of memory and appropriate kernel options, can a single process allocate >15 GB for its use? -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/