From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Jan 16 10:23:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (unknown [198.79.110.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B077C37B404 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:23:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02292; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:23:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200101161823.KAA02292@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:23:01 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: docs/24364: I don't think so! To: jedgar@fxp.org Cc: dima@unixfreak.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010116080918.A66321@peitho.fxp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 16 Jan, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:55:49AM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote: >> Actually the "named_flags" are now in /etc/default/rc.conf, >> so the documentation is incorrect in that we don't say where >> "default rc" is. That is, one could assume 'default rc' to mean >> the 'rc' that ships with the system. That is how I read it. >> However, it *now* means the 'rc' in '/etc/'default' >> It's a very minor doc'ing error, I should have caught it. >> (Good work. Roelof. :-)) >> > > No, 'default rc' != default rc.conf. And /etc/defaults/rc.conf > (not /etc/default/rc.conf) is well documented in rc.conf(5) > Oops.... Typo on my part. I meant to say rc.conf not rc. AND defaults not default. Thanks for catching that correction, Chris. Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message