From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Sep 29 08:24:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA16338 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 08:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp20.portal.net.au [202.12.71.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA16331 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 08:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA00645; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 00:51:03 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199709291521.AAA00645@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Wes Peters cc: Peter Korsten , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Microsoft brainrot (was: r-cmds and DNS and /etc/host.conf) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:46 CST." <199709290600.AAA22484@obie.softweyr.ml.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 00:50:59 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > If we're trying to convince people to put a FreeBSD based server into > their existing Win95 (or Mac, or whatever) environment, what better > configuration vehicle can we give them, than the machine already on > their desktop? Wes: Stop Right Here. If you can come up with a security model that makes this viable on an adequately large scale, I will *happily* abandon almost any other thought I might have of using any other interface and happily work under a browser. If not, and I'm not convinced one way or another, then we have to give this idea the wide berth it will deserve. mike