From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Mar 27 8:49:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C4137B718; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:49:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2RGnNS15474; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:49:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:49:23 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200103271649.f2RGnNS15474@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org, taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Reality check on ESS Technology Maestro-2E h/w "mute" functi Cc: david@catwhisker.org, mobile@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:42:59 -0800 (PST) >From: John Baldwin >On 27-Mar-01 Taku YAMAMOTO wrote: >> According to datasheets, HWVOL_MUTE (== 0x99) came from HWVOL_NOP | 0x11, >> where 0x11 means "mute button pressed". >Ah, someone has these. :) A treasure! >> But, since mute button is actually choded into UP-and-DOWN simultaneously, >> it may happen to misunderstand MUTE button as if an independent >> UP/DOWN event came first. (It is nothing more than my imagination, though.) >> So, perhaps 0x77 came from HWVOL_DOWN | 0x11, I imagine. >> Attached diff will make both 0x77 and 0x99 to be recognized as MUTE. >> (And, hopefully, 0xbb --- HWVOL_UP | 0x11 --- , too) >Looks ok to me. OK; it works for me with yesterday's -STABLE. I'm building today's -CURRENT with it as I type. I anticipate no problems. :-} Thanks, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message