From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 30 13:40:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA18417 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:40:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bingsun1.cc.binghamton.edu (bingsun1.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18405 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:40:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bf20761@binghamton.edu) Received: from localhost (bf20761@localhost) by bingsun1.cc.binghamton.edu (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA09714 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:40:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:40:36 -0500 (EST) From: zhihuizhang X-Sender: bf20761@bingsun1 To: hackers Subject: Re: interrupt unit number or clockframe? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > static void clkintr(struct clockframe frame); > I should have noticed that the above statement is different from the following statement: static void clkintr(struct clockframe * frame); Since we do not use asterisk in the source code, the C handler can be passed an entire structure instead of an address of a structure. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message