From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  2 01:43:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AEAF116A4CE; Sun,  2 Nov 2003 01:43:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3F72843F3F; Sun,  2 Nov 2003 01:43:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (1goa344d@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14])
	by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA29hmSi21806515;
	Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:43:48 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:43:48 +0300 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Valentin Nechayev <netch@netch.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20031102091809.GA310@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
Message-ID: <20031102124123.H39971@news1.macomnet.ru>
References: <200310221014.h9MAEX3V001280@ice.nodomain>
	<20031102091809.GA310@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Dan Strick <strick@covad.net>
cc: dan@ice.nodomain
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 09:43:53 -0000

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, 11:18+0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote:

>  Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current":
>
> DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs
> DS> support.  If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on
> DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect
> DS> summary data in the superblock.  Presumably only one can be correct.
> DS> I just don't know which to blame.
>
> Does this require explicit fsck?
> I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier)
> and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab;
> sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1
> claims superblock is bad.

mckusick's answer:

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100639+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current

Dan's PR:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/58373

-- 
Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org