Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:10:04 +0300 From: FreeLSD <freelsd@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, mike@sentex.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD-6 and em interface speed Message-ID: <20060222071004.GC44603@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060221215255.X37014@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060221165456.GZ44603@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> <20060221215255.X37014@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'd start by going back to SCHED_4BSD and seeing how that affects things. ULE > is an experimental scheduler that may produce inconsistent or undesirable > results depending on workload. OK, I will. And I'll follow your next advice about the tcp_inflight and Mike's advice. Following Nate Nielsen I will post my next results to the freebsd-net. Thanks! -- rea BOFH excuse #51: Cosmic ray particles crashed through the hard disk platter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060222071004.GC44603>