From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 8 9:14:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F399537B643 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:14:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) for current@freebsd.org id 12Sk2E-000KNx-00; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:14:10 +0000 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA43598 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:14:10 GMT (envelope-from jcm) Message-ID: <20000308171409.A43398@freebsd-uk.eu.org> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:14:09 +0000 From: J McKitrick To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Parallel port Zip drive and EPP mode Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Here is a concern i have. I had a hard time getting my parallel port zip to work under 3.4. It turned out there may be a bug in my bios that required me to change from EPP mode to standard bi-directional. Walter noted that EPP mode worked OK for him under 3.4, but did not under -current. Oddly enough, EPP mode worked fine under win95, so there doesn't seem to be some innate incompatiblity between my laptop and Zip drives in EPP mode. Is this worth looking into? -- -=> jm <=- ------------------------------------------------------- The opinions expressed in this message are the opinions of the mail program only, and not of the writer, his employer, or freebsd-uk.eu.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message