From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Wed Jul 10 15:02:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF9715D9656 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (kozubik.com [216.218.240.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF858FDEA for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kozubik.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id x6AF2s5U074007; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from localhost (john@localhost) by kozubik.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id x6AF2nDF074004; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT) From: John Kozubik To: kris@ixsystems.com cc: "'Alexander Leidinger'" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: How many "production" releases will FreeBSD have when the ZoL merge comes in ? In-Reply-To: <2e0401d5372f$ccbc9800$6635c800$@ixsystems.com> Message-ID: References: <16bdb16ada8.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> <2e0401d5372f$ccbc9800$6635c800$@ixsystems.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CFF858FDEA X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of john@kozubik.com designates 216.218.240.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=john@kozubik.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.965,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kozubik.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[130.240.218.216.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: kozubik.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.34)[-0.343,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:216.218.128.0/17, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.56)[ipnet: 216.218.128.0/17(0.39), asn: 6939(-3.11), country: US(-0.06)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:03:00 -0000 Kris, On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, kris@ixsystems.com wrote: > I'm keeping the port pretty updated for exactly this reason. We intend to > use it for FreeBSD 12 here at iX, so far it seems to work pretty well. > You'll just need to build world without ZFS so you don't end up with > conflicts on zfs/zpool and libzfs. Are you currently using ZoL in production for customers ? Pardon my ignorance, but is ZoL in use anywhere in FreeNAS/TrueNAS ? I am pretty sure that we *cannot* run stock/standard ZFS in the base world and give someone in a jail ZoL (with a module) correct ? Thanks.