From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 07:40:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74B916A4CE; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:40:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (storm.uk.FreeBSD.org [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C1043D31; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9Q7eML8036561; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:40:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)i9Q7eLrS036560; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:40:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grovel.grondar.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9Q7bWPB002326; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:37:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Message-Id: <200410260737.i9Q7bWPB002326@grovel.grondar.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mark Murray In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:21:34 PDT." <20041026072133.GA50222@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:37:32 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/etc/defaults Makefile src/etc/mtree Makefile src/etc/namedb Makefile src/etc/pam.d Makefile src/games/fortune/unstr Makefile src/games/ppt Makefile src/games/primes Makefile src/gnu Makefile.inc src/gnu/lib/libgcc ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:40:25 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > Why? What's wrong with the "fake" values? It can make things easier to > read. People get confused and do WANT_FOO=NO and can't figure out why they get FOO. This saves debugging time. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH