From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 07:08:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F10D106566B for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from mx0.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:101:5343::aa]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B218FC14 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx0.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 385A42A28CC3; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:08:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:08:39 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20111021070839.GF1874@hoeg.nl> References: <20111021065912.GE1874@hoeg.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Not setting TERM explicitly wraps commands at 80 columns with nested shells in xterms using sh + bash? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:08:40 -0000 --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 09:00: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Hi Garrett, > > > > * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 08:40: > >> =A0 =A0 If I fire up an xterm without setting TERM=3D{ansi,vt100,xterm= }, > >> [...] > > > > So what's the idea behind this? Why not just set TERM properly? >=20 > It is set properly though -- that's the confusing part: >=20 > $ echo $TERM > xterm Oh, okay. So you mean "If I fire up an xterm without changing the default TERM, [...]", right? Can you check whether `stty size' does return the correct numbers? That way we can determine if it's a problem in xterm, your shell (or maybe the kernel). Thanks! --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOoRp3AAoJEG5e2P40kaK7yQQQAKwaYBXWXqwuROcJoWSv5XAz 6PsRJUJGj2pc45dgMTEwwxhCAZ4lOA5aqsk09pRQCaPa+vC8hvS4+qT3ciiqMolU mjb02N1HzVHQk+MqB5RyWWpxIbiEY2RdeQ/Ha6TEedtVNa/25w+vGtUjiEoBKdgD Tot5LVXj6X/Yr0c4sLPySCcLkLJkE42V8OWYB6kUazwIOD8djTXh9TZPRMtwIRJw UVL101vEITu1Cd+ykunTYT8Lc4ZbIvEWdaoPYGIr7QZFPVYQaNJ5IBLxPBCO47Zv 9J3EK9K6W8FjJzEC8SXVRj+5nPc7gT0vD9yOJCqX5BrbZtb/Zrc5rKC2KuWfZoiJ rKYDXRCw7FqDnzdaz53/lkrEHnogn8CShJ+3tX2jALnU3hiNgpGK6wDlZGFfhCkq G393H2Vr29afyVfWpeJgB9d+FKIu1syuq3e01KjD/SNdDg5MV/fpc6jKgtx5oRP6 PdfmE7EjsgDS1mq2EZ1Jlx7e31DEyxSegn57DKe7VjL6uyrtjfw+W5Y+LlXg69Y4 X7OPEcxRy0IRYMQcThf25ZUJFCwmBf2lpGbLun2kAbLN5Mtnb+13PrKwNEc7DNFS U2w6UCsgCG/IrHpJG0U1qEJq/oYP+FS7CBO+DYIRx0Tp6I8D3cF6povV6SSzkDnt 87T7SSCLDGpYS04LBZOj =uWJO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE--