From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 23 02:15:05 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id CAA26554
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02:15:05 -0700
Received: (from phk@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id CAA26544
          ; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02:15:04 -0700
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk>
Message-Id: <199507230915.CAA26544@freefall.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: Please try this new malloc(3)
To: phk@freefall.cdrom.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199507222206.PAA06101@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Jul 22, 95 03:06:25 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 770       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Let me just clarify a couple of points about this:

1. I didn't expect it to plug into libc as it stands (and jordan has proved 
	this) already.  Add it to the individual programs LDADD like this
		LDADD += /where/you/put/it/malloc.o

2. you get a warning about an inline, don't worry it's not important.

3. The thing I'm interested in at this time is performance, if it doesn't
	perform I will nnot bother further, if it does, I will try to 
	resolve the libc problems, including the sbrk/brk issue.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?