From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 27 11: 4:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mobile.foobie.net (w018.z064220173.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.220.173.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5554D37B4D7 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from envolved.com (IDENT:sbeitzel@mobile.foobie.net [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.foobie.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01359; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:04:27 -0700 Message-Id: <200010271804.LAA01359@mobile.foobie.net> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephen Beitzel Reply-To: Stephen Beitzel Subject: Re: All the x11-wm ports b0rken in 4.1.1-STABLE? To: juha@saarinen.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 27 Oct, Juha Saarinen wrote: > ports-all tag=. [...] > Might be an idea to document that somewhere... I can't be the only one > being bitten by it. It is documented; you just have to know where to look! Take a peek in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile as an example, and /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile. The latter includes a comment warning about making sure you include 'tag=.' if you cvsup ports at the same time as the rest of the world. Yes, it took me a little while to find this. Also, the online handbook at http://www.FreeBSD.org/handbook makes a note of this in the section on cvsup and the ports tree. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message