From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 24 10:01:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF36937B401 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.attbi.com (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138A643F85 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:01:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20030624170152013006d21ce>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:01:52 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h5OH1m1V037302; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:01:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h5OH1lQ1037299; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:01:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: "Martin Ryan" References: <20030624015609.0ECA070EF6@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 24 Jun 2003 13:01:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030624015609.0ECA070EF6@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <44n0g7be9w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re-building sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:01:56 -0000 "Martin Ryan" writes: > What's the best way to rebuild sendmail with DB4? There's a makefile in > /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail and there also a sendmail port and I'm not > sure which is the recommended way to go. FWIW, I want to get > milter-sender going > (http://www.snert.com/Software/milter-sender/index.shtml). I think that in the long run, you'll find it easier to go with the port. In the shorter run, it may not matter so much.