From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Nov  8 16:01:11 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA29943
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:01:11 -0800
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA29935
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:01:05 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA00284; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:00:52 -0800
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:00:52 -0800
Message-Id: <199511090000.QAA00284@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: pst@shockwave.com
CC: hsu@cs.hut.fi, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199511082348.PAA10259@precipice.shockwave.com> (message from Paul Traina on Wed, 08 Nov 1995 15:48:34 -0800)
Subject: Re: port of strace?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Sounds like there is a value add for such a port.  I don't think we'd
 * reject it should it be submitted.

Umm, let me just point out that we've never "reject"ed a port because
it's "value" is not enough.  There has been a certain member (Paul,
that's you :) who complains from time to time that a port is not
worthy (in much less decent language), but that has never been the
attitude of the whole ports team or the portsmaster (that's me).

Anything that is submitted that compiles like a port and packages like 
a port is welcome.... :)

The Portsmaster