From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 31 16:00:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA17933 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA17915 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:00:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA19306; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:59:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199610312359.PAA19306@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com cc: Javier A Garcia Mantecon , "'questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro + In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 1996 09:17:41 EST." <199610311417.JAA23770@goffette.research.megasoft.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:59:30 -0800 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>>> "Javier" == Javier A Garcia Mantecon writes: > >Javier> Is there any special configuration for an Intel EthrExpress >Javier> Pro. I still don't get it running, I've changed iomem, size, >Javier> irq at the conf. mode. I should be at irq 10, port 0x300, mem >Javier> 32K at 0xd0000. What should I do? > >Hmm. I have two such boards on a 2.1.5R box here. Are you sure that >you've got the fxp device driver built into your kernel? > >fxp0 rev 1 int a irq 10 on pci0:11 >fxp1 rev 1 int a irq 9 on pci0:15 If we're talking about the Pro/10+ card, then I'm sorry to say that this isn't supported. It will require some additional code in the 'fxp' driver to select the proper mode for the PHY. If we're talking about the Pro/10, then that card isn't yet supported, but might be in the future via a new ethernet driver. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project