From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Mar 18 13:48: 0 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from poseidon.student.umd.edu (poseidon.student.umd.edu [129.2.220.99])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8466837B61D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 13:47:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bfoz@glue.umd.edu)
Received: from glue.umd.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by poseidon.student.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00286;
	Sat, 18 Mar 2000 16:47:48 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from bfoz@glue.umd.edu)
Message-ID: <38D3F984.9CB083D@glue.umd.edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 16:47:48 -0500
From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu>
Reply-To: bfoz@glue.umd.edu
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@jaxon.net>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Eterm?
References: <38D3C674.20C4359A@glue.umd.edu> <20000318121557.B1912@norn.ca.eu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Chris Piazza wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 01:09:56PM -0500, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> > Is the Eterm port still being maintained? Version 0.9 has been out for a
> > while now and the ports tree still has version 0.8.10. I guess I can't
> > complain too much, I haven't even tried to get 0.9 to build. Maybe I'll
> > try that...
> 
> It is at 0.8.10 because that is the latest stable version.  0.9 is
> development.
> 
> -Chris

Yup, you're right. Somehow I had gotten the idea that 0.9 had become the
stable branch. Must have been smoking something. Sorry.

-Brandon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message