From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 16 20:16:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC1816A401 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91BD13C459 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208A59F23C8; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:58:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id haYr680psh1D; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:58:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-5063f539.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.245.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E518199D190; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4623D53A.9000802@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:57:46 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: remko@FreeBSD.org References: <20070416162439.af1509eb.rnsanchez@wait4.org> <4623D2B9.4070903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4623D2B9.4070903@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez Subject: Re: duplicates X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:16:52 -0000 Remko Lodder schrieb: > Hello, > > No problem, did you read the big warning before the submit button? The big warning is good, but it's still not clear and comfortable enough. Is there a better fix planned or isn't that possible to process the PRs with the CGI script in an another way? TIA, Gabor