From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 7 2: 1:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7143D14F7B; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 02:01:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA28090; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:59:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Brad Knowles , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates in latest build? References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 07 Sep 1999 10:59:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "07 Sep 1999 10:51:17 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > 3. The first person to resort to rank or seniority to > compensate for a lack of valid arguments automatically loses the > argument. Oh, and I forgot: 4. The first person to resort to net.god name-dropping to compensate for a lack of valid arguments automatically loses the argument. (and my g/f says I should use "relevant arguments" instead of "valid arguments") DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message