From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sat Aug 24 14:05:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB89C0DBC for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46G0Qh1Kjjz3HD6 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2BCAAC0DBB; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A65CC0DBA for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46G0Qh09hrz3HD4 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95796380 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7OE5FWf015849 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x7OE5F7T015848 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240054] audio/linux-c7-openal-soft: Add missing 32-bit libraries Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: h2+fbsdports@fsfe.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240054 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1) Thank you for looking into this and sorry for the incomplete description. Y= our updated description of the problem is absolutely correct. I don't fully comprehend which package sites are chosen when (seems to be a mixture of CentOS and fedora), but it seems like you are right and there is= no official openal-soft package for i686. I found this package which seems to work: https://centos.pkgs.org/7/harbottle-wine32-x86_64/openal-soft-1.16.0-3.el7.= i686.rpm.html But I can't double check because the game that needs it has other issues. A= lso I don't know what the policy is on including packages from inofficial repos. In general, it's been a while for me working with bugzilla so sorry if I get some things wrong. I want to re-evaluate whether I can get rid of the linux-dualboot now. In general I am testing quite a few games with linux-c7. What is the procedure for problems I find? Should I report each individual = game or should I try to aggregate similar looking problems into individual repor= ts? I can make all games available to maintainers for debugging if you e-mail m= e :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=