From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 14 11:28:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29852 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:28:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA29845 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:28:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA20191; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:28:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:28:14 -0500 (EST) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: Duncan Barclay cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS thoughts In-Reply-To: <199812141635.IAA10419@mailgate.cadence.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Duncan Barclay wrote: > I wonder, do you see the retuned IP address to be the IP address of > the first up network interface? If so this is due to the portmapper > (I think) binding to the first IP interface it finds which is marked > up. I'm not sure if it works differently, but I'm using Wietse's "secure" portmapper replacement. I grabbed it so I could put acls on portmap, but I do have two interfaces and it always seems to grab the right one... Charles > > Try using NFS with point-to-point interface set upand ifconfig'd on > the parallel port but nothing on the other end but. Probe the > parallel port before any of the NICs and watch things fall over... > > Duncan > > PS. Of course, this may have been fixed, but it was a problem about > 9months ago when I was playing with a laptop.;-) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message