From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 12:43:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC4216A4CE for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:43:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B02E43D45 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:43:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (12-216-240-169.client.mchsi.com[12.216.240.169]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with ESMTP id <20040903124305m920002t9ge>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:43:06 +0000 Message-ID: <413866D8.1020104@math.missouri.edu> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:43:04 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040825 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_K=F6ller?= References: <200409030732.i837WOw05534@rayadm.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> In-Reply-To: <200409030732.i837WOw05534@rayadm.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: lars@koellers.net Subject: Re: single precision fftw wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:43:07 -0000 Lars Köller wrote: > ---------- > > In reply to Stephen Montgomery-Smith who wrote: > > >>Dear Lars and ports, >> >>I am interested in creating a port for gromacs (http://www.gromacs.org) >>and it requires fftw built using single precision. The super-easy way >>is to create a port sfftw which is a copy of fftw with a line like >>CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-float --enable-type-prefix >>added in. Or I could add some kind of option to fftw. Anyway, since >>Lars is the maintainer of fftw I would like to coordinate with him about >>it. And I am copying this to ports as well just in case anyone else has >>suggestions. > > > Hi, I'm just back from holidays. I think if we have the requirement of > a single precision of another port, it is the only solution to make a > separate port. > > However, are the libraries separated, so it is possible to have both > installed? > Yes - if one builds fftw correctly, the only common files between single precision and double precision will be the docs.