From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 18 04:52:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA00888 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 04:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from konig.elte.hu (konig.elte.hu [157.181.6.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA00528 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 04:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neumann.cs.elte.hu (neumann [157.181.6.200]) by konig.elte.hu (8.8.3/8.7.3/7s) with ESMTP id MAA26178 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 12:54:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (sebesty@localhost) by neumann.cs.elte.hu (8.8.3/8.7.3/4c) with SMTP id MAA20191 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 12:54:46 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: neumann.cs.elte.hu: sebesty owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 12:54:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: Zoltan Sebestyen To: FreeBSD hackers mailinglist Subject: loadavg Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Thanks for all who replied. The reason why I'm interested in this topic is that I'm porting an application similar to Windows NT's taskmanager. I wonder if these sysctl commands give me the same information about the cpuload and the memory load as NT's taskmanager does. Thanks in advance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sebestyen Zoltan It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up. szoli@caesar.elte.hu But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?